Friday, September 22, 2006
National Center for Science Education (NCSE) is pleased to announce the publication of Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools (Beacon Press, 2006), edited by Eugenie C. Scott and Glenn Branch, NCSE's executive director and deputy director, respectively, and with contributions from Scott, Branch, Nicholas J. Matzke (also of NCSE) and Paul R. Gross, Martinez Hewlett and Ted Peters, Jay D. Wexler, and Brian Alters, and a foreword by the Reverend Barry W. Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Bill Nye the Science Guy writes, 'If you're concerned about scientific literacy, read this book. The authors of Not in Our Classrooms are authorities on the various battles fought over the teaching of evolution - biology's fundamental discovery.'
More than eighty years after the Scopes trial, creationism is alive and well. Through local school boards, sympathetic politicians, and well-funded organizations, a strong movement has developed to encourage the teaching of the latest incarnation of creationism - intelligent design - as a scientifically credible theory alongside evolution in science classes. Although intelligent design suffered a serious defeat in the recent Kitzmiller v. Dover trial, its proponents are bound to continue their assault on evolution education. [Review]
Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools: Amazon UK | US
technorati tags: national, center, science, education, ncse, classroooms, intelligent+design, wrong, schools, beacon, press, eugenie, c, scott, glenn, branch, matzke, gross, hewlett, peters, wexler, lynn, americans, united, seperation, church, state, nye, guy, literacy, book, authors, biology, fundamental, discovery, scopes, trial, creationism, school, boards, theory, kitzmiller, dover, review, amazon, uk, us
John Latter / Jorolat
Links to this post:
<< 'General Evolution News' Home